Case StudyAEOCRO

Case Study: How One Brand Reworked Landing Content for AEO and Cut CPA 18%

aad3535

2026-01-27

9 min read

Real-world case study: AEO landing page revamp cut PPC CPA 18% with A/B tests, structured content, and a reproducible playbook.

Hook: Your PPC is Spending More Than It Should—Here’s the Fix

High CPCs, fragmented attribution, and landing pages that don't answer user intent are bleeding your paid budgets. In this 2026 case study we show how a mid-market direct-to-consumer brand reworked landing content with an AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) focus and closed an 18% reduction in CPA inside 12 weeks. This is a practical, step-by-step playbook you can replicate.

Background: Why AEO Landing Pages Matter for PPC in 2026

Search and ad ecosystems evolved a lot between late 2024 and 2026. Generative engines, AI-powered search snippets, and more selective ad placement mean the landing page needs to do two things at once: meet the answer-driven expectations of modern searchers and convert them quickly once they arrive. That dual pressure is why AEO landing page work is now a performance lever for PPC managers, not just SEOs.

Client snapshot

Industry: Consumer electronics (mid-ticket purchases)
Monthly paid search spend pre-project: $140k
Primary goal: Reduce CPA and increase conversion rate without increasing spend
Baseline metrics: CPA $220, Conversion Rate 2.8%, Avg CPC $1.60

Audit Findings: What We Changed and Why

The audit mixed qualitative UX review, quantitative data pulls from GA4 and server-side events, and behavioral heatmaps. We found three structural problems that were costing conversions:

Fragmented, shallow content—pages focused on features and hero images but failed to answer intent-based questions that both search AI and users expect.
Poor structured data—no FAQ schema, product schema was incomplete, so AI-driven answer boxes and rich results were not supported.
Slow interactive load—Core Web Vitals were okay for passive metrics but interactive readiness lagged behind, hurting ad landing relevancy scores.

Hypothesis

By converting the landing page into an AEO-optimized experience that delivers fast, structured answers above the fold and supports rich results with schema, we expected to:

Increase conversion rate
Improve ad relevance → lower CPCs via better quality signals
Reduce CPA by at least 12-20% within 8–12 weeks

Step-by-Step Implementation (What We Did)

Below is the exact sequence and templates we used. Treat this as a repeatable checklist.

1. Prioritize intent clusters and map to landing sections

We pulled the top-performing keywords and queries from Search Console and paid search data, then grouped them into 4 intent clusters: Compare, Buy, Specs, Troubleshoot. Each cluster became a clearly labeled section on the page so users and AI could find concise answers quickly.

2. Create structured, scan-first content

Real users skim. AEO benefits from content that is scannable and explicit. For each section we used:

1-line TL;DR summary
3–5 bullet benefits
Short expandable answers to common questions

Example heading structure (template):

H2: Product name — 1-line value statement
H3: TL;DR — one-sentence answer to the intent
H3: Why it matters — 3 bullets
H3: Top questions — quick answers (FAQ)

3. Add precise FAQ and HowTo schema

Instead of generic FAQ content, we answered the exact queries found in paid search and site search. We published FAQPage schema for 12 questions and concise HowTo schema for setup/use flows. This increases the chance of appearing in answer boxes and provides authoritative snippets for AI summarizers.

Sample FAQ displayed as copy (we used HTML entities for schema snippet in CMS):

<script type='application/ld+json'>
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How long does the battery last?",
      "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Up to 10 hours under normal use." }
    }
  ]
}
</script>

4. Rework hero and above-the-fold to answer intent

The new hero included a one-line answer, a 30-character value proposition, and an immediate 'Buy' CTA plus a secondary 'Compare specs' link. That meant both transactional and research intents were served instantly.

5. Stabilize layout for AI summarization

Generative engines prefer predictable structure. We used consistent H2/H3 hierarchy, removed modal-heavy content above the fold, and ensured the most critical copy appears in the DOM early so crawlers and on-device models can summarize it accurately.

6. Improve interactive readiness and Core Web Vitals

Optimizations included server-side rendering for hero content, deferring non-critical JavaScript, and compressing images with AVIF. Interactive readiness improved such that Time to Interactive dropped from 4.1s to 1.9s on 3G throttled tests.

We added Review schema and short testimonial snippets right under the hero that included star rating and count. This improves trust signals both for users and for answer engines that surface review data.

8. Personalize with signal-based modules

Using first-party signals from the ad click (UTM and server-side tagging and server-side event context), we exposed a minimal personalization module: offers for returning visitors vs new users, and quick links for users who previously viewed comparison pages.

9. QA for ad-to-page message match

We aligned ad headlines, description lines, and display URLs with landing page H2/H3 to maximize ad relevance scores. Message mismatch was a major drag on quality; tightening it improved the Google Ads quality impression share.

10. Instrumentation and experiment setup

Measurement used server-side GA4 events, BigQuery for raw session joins, and an Optimizely A/B test funnel. We duplicated the production tagging server-side to ensure clean attribution under privacy-level changes introduced in late 2025. For lightweight experiment data and quick joins we leaned on spreadsheet-first edge datastores to speed iteration without over-indexing expensive warehouse queries.

A/B Test Design and Execution

We ran a classic control vs variant experiment.

Traffic split: 50/50 across paid search traffic for 6 weeks
Primary metric: CPA (goal purchases tracked via server-side events)
Secondary metrics: Conversion rate, Avg CPC, Bounce rate, Engaged sessions
Minimum detectable effect: 12% CPA reduction at 80% power

We monitored sample sizes daily and aborted early if significance was reached with stable uplift. We kept the test running for an additional 7 days after statistical significance to validate stability.

Results: The Numbers Behind the 18% CPA Lift

After the 6-week test and a 2-week ramp, the variant delivered measurable improvements:

CPA: from $220 to $180 (18% reduction)
Conversion rate: from 2.8% to 3.36% (+20% relative)
Avg CPC: from $1.60 to $1.46 (-8.75% lower)
Quality Score proxies: ad relevance and landing experience improved, contributing to lower CPCs
Engaged sessions: +28% (more users engaged with content and FAQ)

"Within eight weeks the AEO landing page stopped being a cost center and became a conversion engine. The 18% CPA drop was sustainable and replicable across multiple campaigns."

Why It Worked: Mechanisms Driving Performance

Better intent matching: Users found the answer they expected immediately, lowering friction and increasing conversions.
Improved ad relevance: Closer message match between ad and landing improved quality signals, which reduced CPCs.
Structured content fed richer SERP experiences: Schema and predictable structure improved eligibility for rich results and AI snippets.
Faster interactive load: Reduced bounce and improved engagement.
Test discipline: Strong instrumentation and server-side events maintained accurate CPA measurement despite ATT and ITP changes in 2025.

Benchmarks & Replication Guidance

Use these benchmarks as a sanity check when you run your own AEO landing page experiments:

Expected CPA improvement range: 10%–25% for intent-misaligned pages
Conversion rate improvement range: 10%–30% depending on traffic quality
Time to impact: 6–12 weeks for test + ramp
Key risks: over-optimizing for AI snippets at expense of actual users; ensure human-tested UX stays primary

Actionable Playbook: How to Run Your Own AEO Landing Page Project

Audit top-performing paid queries and group into intent clusters
Create concise, answer-first above-the-fold copy for each cluster
Build a short FAQ and HowTo with exact query answers and add schema
Optimize for interactive readiness and mobile-first rendering
Align ad copy to landing H2/H3 headlines
Instrument with server-side events and set a clear primary metric (CPA)
Run an A/B test with adequate power and monitor secondary engagement metrics

Template: TL;DR Hero Copy

Use this fill-in-the-blank for the hero one-liner:

[Product] delivers [primary benefit] in [timeframe] — ideal for [who].

Example: "Alpha Speaker delivers studio-quality sound in under 2 minutes setup—ideal for home audio enthusiasts."

2026 Trends & Future Predictions

Two trends shaped how we approached this project and will matter for the next 12–24 months:

AI-driven answers amplify the need for structured, concise content. Platforms increasingly synthesize content instead of just linking. If your landing page is not clearly answering user intent, it will be summarized by an AI and traffic may not convert.
Privacy-first attribution and server-side measurement are standard. Late 2025 updates to measurement practices mean server-side tagging and first-party event strategies are essential to accurately measure CPA and feed personalization modules.

Common Objections and How We Address Them

Objection: Won't structured answers reduce direct clicks because AI answers users on SERP?

Answer: Good structured content increases qualified clicks. For purchase-intent queries, users still click to convert. Problems arise when pages are unclear—AEO done well filters traffic toward conversion, not away from it.

Objection: We don’t have dev bandwidth for major changes

Answer: Start small. Prioritize hero copy, FAQ content, and server-side event wiring. Those three moves alone delivered most of the impact in this case study.

Key Takeaways

AEO-focused landing pages are now a PPC performance lever, not just an SEO checkbox.
Structured, answer-first content reduces friction and improves both conversion rate and ad efficiency.
Server-side measurement and predictable DOM structure are critical for reliable CPA reporting in a privacy-first world.
Repeatable playbook: intent mapping, concise hero, FAQ schema, measurable A/B test.

Ready-to-use Checklist

Map paid queries to intent clusters
Draft 1-line answer above the fold for each cluster
Publish a concise FAQ with schema for top 10 questions
Improve interactive readiness (TTI & CLS)
Align ad copy and run a powered A/B test
Measure with server-side events and verify in BigQuery

Final Thoughts

This case study demonstrates that tactical content and structural changes—when informed by intent data and supported by modern measurement—can materially lower CPA. In our project the 18% CPA reduction was the result of better message match, faster load, and structured content designed for both humans and AI summarizers.

Call to Action

If you want a reproducible audit and AEO landing page playbook tailored to your account, we offer a 6-week conversion sprint that includes intent mapping, schema implementation, server-side instrumentation, and an A/B test template. Click to request the sprint and get a projected CPA impact estimate based on your current traffic.

ad3535

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.